Rik Roots
10-25-2003, 09:17 PM
Ain't it typical - some kind soul offers you webspace to post your innermost musings, then some other bastard comes along and rates it.
Anyways, I visited my page today (dust and polish time), then spent some time wandering around. Currently there are:
17 sites in the Experimental section;
8 sites in the Formal section;
73 sites in the General section;
6 sites in the Teen section; and
631 sites in the Under Construction section.
Given the sheer number of sites, it's difficult to know which ones to visit. So I'm undertaking an audit. Partial results follow.
The rating system I am using is a score between 0 and 5, with:
0 - site not built, or spam, or full of dead-end links
1 - timewaster
2 - routine poetry
3 - poetry that shows some promise
4 - some good solid poetry
5 - notable poetry
I'll make no apologies for putting noses out of joint. If other people want to disagree with my scores, feel free to do so - or even better, undertake an audit of their own and publish the results on this board.
Here follow the results of my trawl through Experimental, Formal and Teen:
Experimental
============
Name pages poems grade
------------------- ----- ----- -----
allusion 1 lots 3
dredgetheocean 1 2 2
ds30 1 1 2
glavier 1 0 0
hillbillybaby 1 3 2
ifejika1 0 0 0
Ivorysiren 1 0 0
Neilwilson 1 1 2
Paulstrong 1 0 0
plumbgrl 1 1 1
Pseb7389 1 1 1
rajasree 1 1 2
snuffy 0 0 0
tfran 1 3 2
thegrauniad 1 0 1
Twice_midnight 1 0 1
zenmonkey 1 1 4
Formal
======
Name pages poems grade
------------------- ----- ----- -----
appledragon 1 lots 2
cloabn multi lots 2
geolarson2 multi 3 2
haydenjames 1 0 0
raica 1 0 0
tooblue multi 2 2
wildman666_us 1 1 2
wittyvixen 1 0 0
Teen
====
Name pages poems grade
------------------- ----- ----- -----
adams_baby_girl89 0 0 0
beautiful_darkness 0 0 0
becka 0 0 0
captainspecial 1 1 2
purplemudd182 1 lots 2
rubberducky multi 4 2
I did spot one instance where someone had posted work that was not their own - as this person has colour-indexed work and quotes by themselves and by others, I think the lack of attribution was an oversight on their part. I'd strongly suggest to the person that they should attribute the quotes very quickly, and remove the poem - the Amplifier rules are explicit: all work posted should be the poet's original work.
I'll do the big swing through the general section over the next few hours ...
Anyways, I visited my page today (dust and polish time), then spent some time wandering around. Currently there are:
17 sites in the Experimental section;
8 sites in the Formal section;
73 sites in the General section;
6 sites in the Teen section; and
631 sites in the Under Construction section.
Given the sheer number of sites, it's difficult to know which ones to visit. So I'm undertaking an audit. Partial results follow.
The rating system I am using is a score between 0 and 5, with:
0 - site not built, or spam, or full of dead-end links
1 - timewaster
2 - routine poetry
3 - poetry that shows some promise
4 - some good solid poetry
5 - notable poetry
I'll make no apologies for putting noses out of joint. If other people want to disagree with my scores, feel free to do so - or even better, undertake an audit of their own and publish the results on this board.
Here follow the results of my trawl through Experimental, Formal and Teen:
Experimental
============
Name pages poems grade
------------------- ----- ----- -----
allusion 1 lots 3
dredgetheocean 1 2 2
ds30 1 1 2
glavier 1 0 0
hillbillybaby 1 3 2
ifejika1 0 0 0
Ivorysiren 1 0 0
Neilwilson 1 1 2
Paulstrong 1 0 0
plumbgrl 1 1 1
Pseb7389 1 1 1
rajasree 1 1 2
snuffy 0 0 0
tfran 1 3 2
thegrauniad 1 0 1
Twice_midnight 1 0 1
zenmonkey 1 1 4
Formal
======
Name pages poems grade
------------------- ----- ----- -----
appledragon 1 lots 2
cloabn multi lots 2
geolarson2 multi 3 2
haydenjames 1 0 0
raica 1 0 0
tooblue multi 2 2
wildman666_us 1 1 2
wittyvixen 1 0 0
Teen
====
Name pages poems grade
------------------- ----- ----- -----
adams_baby_girl89 0 0 0
beautiful_darkness 0 0 0
becka 0 0 0
captainspecial 1 1 2
purplemudd182 1 lots 2
rubberducky multi 4 2
I did spot one instance where someone had posted work that was not their own - as this person has colour-indexed work and quotes by themselves and by others, I think the lack of attribution was an oversight on their part. I'd strongly suggest to the person that they should attribute the quotes very quickly, and remove the poem - the Amplifier rules are explicit: all work posted should be the poet's original work.
I'll do the big swing through the general section over the next few hours ...