Harry R
01-29-2004, 02:43 PM
This is a history of haiku, traced through the works of 10 major haiku poets -
http://www.big.or.jp/~loupe/links/ehisto/ehisinx.shtml
I think it's interesting because in the introductions to each poet, it touches on some of the debates within the world of Japanese haiku - different schools of thought about subject matter, tone, appropriate language and so on.
The majority of things I've found about haiku on the net are incredibly simplistic (and often either patronising or over-reverent). At least this potted history gives some sense of the diversity within the tradition. The problem is that neither the haiku themselves, nor the critical analyses, are translated into flawless English. That means I found I had to take their word for it on a lot of the effects that were supposedly found within the poems. A few more detailed analyses of particular poems to demonstrate the points made might have been good.
Anyway, even though it's a bit frustrating at times, I found it worth reading.
Harry
http://www.big.or.jp/~loupe/links/ehisto/ehisinx.shtml
I think it's interesting because in the introductions to each poet, it touches on some of the debates within the world of Japanese haiku - different schools of thought about subject matter, tone, appropriate language and so on.
The majority of things I've found about haiku on the net are incredibly simplistic (and often either patronising or over-reverent). At least this potted history gives some sense of the diversity within the tradition. The problem is that neither the haiku themselves, nor the critical analyses, are translated into flawless English. That means I found I had to take their word for it on a lot of the effects that were supposedly found within the poems. A few more detailed analyses of particular poems to demonstrate the points made might have been good.
Anyway, even though it's a bit frustrating at times, I found it worth reading.
Harry