PDA

View Full Version : A Blurb On Clarity


tbm
05-15-2001, 02:55 PM
By most traditional standards of poetry, the brief advice I am about to give you regarding writing craft is very misleading. That is, most novice authors should invest the least amount of their early time improving clarity in their work. I have found in my teaching of poetry that many new authors misconstrue the concept of clarity as an inhibition of metaphor and sound (though it is not), and thus their writing becomes bland and suffers.

As a novice author, if you are interested in a template for improving the clarity of your work quickly and effectively, I offer the following three steps:

1. Print a copy of your poem with enough marginal space to insert written interpretation.

2. In this space, next to or between each line, record exactly what it is in literal terms that your writing is communicating (if you yourself do not know, this is a good time to take stock of what you actually have). Limit your comments to the base events and facts of each thought.

3. Compare this base analysis to the figurative interpretation you have presented your reader. You can now identify if and where the full poem does not measure up to the original idea and make adjustments accordingly.

* Generally, clarity will come in and of itself as you read and write more poetry. This, of course, means that much of your early work will probably not be up to the standards of notable publication in terms of clarity, but the more time you save with this reverse method, the more time you can concentrate on improving other, equally important areas of your writing, such as sonics and symbolism, which do not come as easily to most new authors.

bates

&*(9)%46#$&
05-15-2001, 05:06 PM
I am glad that you posted this bates. I am sure the problem of which you write (i.e novice authors-especially poets not being clear about what clarity is) comes from years
of poetry being taught at school as though it
(poetry) were a code to be cracked.

I certain that there would be newbies who read http://www.everypoet.com/poetry/poetry_forums/Forum10/HTML/000861.html
and thought, "How come WCW gets away with not
making it clear whether or not it is raining."

Then there is the plagarised Raymond Carver poem in "Outside" which was criticised by somecritics on this site for a lack of clarity.

The problem for me has always been how to be
clear without insulting the reader's intelligence and without doing all the work for him/her and thus negating the joys of interpretation (and the wonderful arguments
that occur when people's interpretations differ) and discovery- and that mysterious and magical element (the aha! reaction: "Now, I get it!" ) that differeniates poetry from prose.

Thanks again, David


[This message has been edited by &*(9)%46#$& (edited 05-15-2001).]

rikroots
05-16-2001, 05:15 PM
Amen to this advice.

For me personally, a good poem tells a good story. If there is no storyline, then I often struggle to see the purpose of the poem. Because it is, in the end, all about entertainment, yes?

Modernist and postmodernist poets disagreeig with me should form an orderly queue...

Rik, knee deep

Also visit EveryAuthor.com, our new site for prose, featuring online books and writer's forums including fiction writer's forums and non-fiction forums